George Orwell.s Denial of Objective Reality In Totalitarian Regimes

George Orwell's  Denial of  Objective  Reality In Totalitarian Regimes
Bernard Pyron

In "As I Please: The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell," he wrote about the denial of of objective reality in totalitarian regimes. He saw the denial of objective reality by the Marxists in the Soviet Union, and that in Nazi Germany lying was so common that the Germans would not believe that anyone was telling the truth. We are now seeing the same kind of denial of objective reality by the American political Left and by some in the Republican Party. who work for the ruling elite..

In the Soviet Union the Marxist version of the Hegelian Dialectic was made into a propaganda weapon.
Marx said "In the eyes of the dialectical philosophy, nothing is established for
all time, nothing is absolute or sacred."

The Marxist dialectic has become a procedure for bringing about Orwell's denial of objective reality; it is used now almost everywhere.

The elite were able to use a small number of Transformational Marxists in our major universities to bring in political correctness and the widespread use of the Marxist version of the Hegelian dialectic. And after the sixties there were a few social engineers like A.H.Maslow,Carl R. Rogers, Norman O. Brown, and Irvin Yalom whose efforts worked for the Marxist Left in the Takedown and Transformation of the U.S.culture.
The Marxist Frankfurter Theodore Adorno operated out of the University of California at Berkeley in the fifties.. William Coulson told me that Abraham Maslow, the psychologist at Brandeis University, "hung out with the Frankfurters," apparently meaning he personally knew Herbert Marcuse, who was at Brandeis. I know nothing about Carl Rogers having any association with the Marxist Frankfurters, though his theories moved in a Transformational Marxist direction. Rogers was one of my professors at the University of Wisconsin in the sixties.

Revelation 13: 11 says the second beast has two horns like a lamb, but speaks like a dragon. "And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon."
A lamb has two horns? How does the dragon speak? In Genesis 3 the "serpent" "was more subtle than any beast in the field," and he used the dialectic on Eve, saying in effect lets talk about you eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. "Lets have a dialog." "And come to a consensus."

The big mistake that Eve made was to enter into a dialog with Satan. When Christ was tempted by Satan (Matthew 4: 4-10), he did not dialog with him, but answered "It is written," citing absolute truths from scripture. So Satan was defeated when he tried to work the dialectic on Jesus Christ.

God's way of communicating has always been the didactic, not the dialectic. When Satan tempted Christ in Matthew 4: 3-11, the dialectic didn't work on Jesus. It didn't move him one inch off his absolute truth. He answered the devil with the didactic, "It is written" (Matthew 4: 10).

Then in John 8 the Pharisees tried to use the dialectic on Jesusand that did not work too well either..
Marx and then  Freud decided that there is no God and Marx began to say there is no absolute truth and no absolute morality. Everything is an opinion. Remember the "Hegelian dialectic?" Remember "dialectical materialism" in Marxism?

Transformational Marxism came into the United States in the fifties in the form of the Frankfurt School who posed mostly as psychiatrists and psychologists. They operated from the major universities. And other influences came in, again from psychology as a number of change agents in that field began to operate. In the forties and fifties the Group Dynamics movement under Kurt Lewin made use of the dialectic.The Encounter Group Movement made use of findings of Group Dynamics.on how to manipulate small groups.

"Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the
heavenly family, the former must be destroyed (annihilated), in theory
and in practice." Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4

“The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by
accepting belongingness to the group.” Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Benne
Human Relations in Curriculum Change

"And on the basis of this individual growth of each in our conditions a new
type of mighty socialist collective will in the long run be formed, where
“I” and “we” will merge into one inseparable whole. Such a collective can
only develop on the basis of profound ideological solidarity and an equally
profound emotional rapprochement, mutual understanding."
Nadezhda K. Krupskaya a, Letter to A. M. Gorky.